SALSA: Soup-Based Alignment Learning for Stronger Adaptation in RLHF
AuthorsAtoosa Chegini, Hamid Kazemi, Iman Mirzadeh, Dong Yin, Maxwell Horton, Moin Nabi, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Keivan Alizadeh
SALSA: Soup-Based Alignment Learning for Stronger Adaptation in RLHF
AuthorsAtoosa Chegini, Hamid Kazemi, Iman Mirzadeh, Dong Yin, Maxwell Horton, Moin Nabi, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Keivan Alizadeh
This paper was accepted at the Fine-Tuning in Modern Machine Learning (FITML) Workshop at NeurIPS 2024.
In Large Language Model (LLM) development, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is crucial for aligning models with human values and preferences. RLHF traditionally relies on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the current policy and a frozen initial policy as a reference, which is added as a penalty in policy optimization algorithms like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). While this constraint prevents models from deviating too far from the initial checkpoint, it limits exploration of the reward landscape, reducing the model’s ability to discover higher-quality solutions. As a result, policy optimization is often trapped in a narrow region of the parameter space, leading to suboptimal alignment and performance. This paper presents SALSA (Soup-based Alignment Learning for Stronger Adaptation), a novel approach designed to overcome these limitations by creating a more flexible and better located reference model through weight-space averaging of two independent supervised fine-tuned (SFT) models. This model soup allows for larger deviation in KL divergence and exploring a promising region of the solution space without sacrificing stability. By leveraging this more robust reference model, SALSA fosters better exploration, achieving higher rewards and improving model robustness, out-of-distribution generalization, and performance. We validate the effectiveness of SALSA through extensive experiments on popular open models (Llama2-7B, Mistral-7B, and Gemma-2B) across various benchmarks (MT-Bench, Arena-Hard, UltraFeedback), where it consistently surpasses PPO by fostering deeper exploration and achieving superior alignment in LLMs.
Personalized Group Relative Policy Optimization for Heterogenous Preference Alignment
April 2, 2026research area Methods and Algorithms, research area Speech and Natural Language Processing
Despite their sophisticated general-purpose capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to align with diverse individual preferences because standard post-training methods, like Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), optimize for a single, global objective. While Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is a widely adopted on-policy reinforcement learning framework, its group-based normalization implicitly assumes that all…
Policy Maps: Tools for Guiding the Unbounded Space of LLM Behaviors
November 3, 2025research area Data Science and Annotation, research area Human-Computer Interactionconference UIST
AI policy sets boundaries on acceptable behavior for AI models, but this is challenging in the context of large language models (LLMs): how do you ensure coverage over a vast behavior space? We introduce policy maps, an approach to AI policy design inspired by the practice of physical mapmaking. Instead of aiming for full coverage, policy maps aid effective navigation through intentional design choices about which aspects to capture and which to…